[pmwiki-users] Re: Visble anchors (Re: FAQ Page Layout)
chr at home.se
chr at home.se
Thu Aug 4 12:27:23 CDT 2005
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Neil Herber wrote:
> At 2005-08-04 06:49 PM +0200, chr at home.se is rumored to have said:
> >So in short, I think the FAQ should have visible anchors. As for a link
> >that goes back to the TOC, that's useful for those people who don't feel
> >like pressing the HOME key... :-)
>
> If the FAQ has a TOC, then the link that the TOC provides points directly
> to the (invisible) anchor. In Firefox under Windoze, you can right-click on
> a link and select "Copy Link Location" which you then paste into the email.
> I hope that all other browsers work the same way.
>
> Having a visible anchor does not provide this facility - rather, it lets
> the reader see where the anchor is. (Unless I grossly misunderstand visible
> anchors). In a FAQ, the target will always be the question, so a visible
> anchor is just redundant page decoration.
I think you misunderstand the visible anchor... Assume I've found a
suitable answer in an FAQ that has lots of questions. Now I need the URI
of this answer. Since I needed to actually read the answer, it's right in
there in the browser window. There is also the *visible* anchor just to
the left of the question, where the visible anchor is actually a link that
points to this question. Now I can just use Copy Link Location to get the
URI of question. Otherwise I have to:
* Go to the TOC
* Search the TOC for the item pointing to the question/answer I was
just looking at
* Copy Link Location ...
See here for instance http://wiki.lyx.org/SiteTest/VisibleAnchors
Btw, Opera also has Copy Link Location although it's name is slightly
different IRCC. I really hate using IE because it doesn't have this...
> I don't use the home key or TOC-link, I spin my scroll wheel! ;-)
You get a sore finger doing that when you have a loooong FAQ :-)
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
More information about the pmwiki-users
mailing list