[pmwiki-users] Conventions at pmwiki.org (Was: Comments pages vs ...)

Tegan Dowling tmdowling at gmail.com
Thu Jun 1 11:17:59 CDT 2006


On 6/1/06, Ben Wilson <dausha at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/1/06, christian.ridderstrom at gmail.com
> <christian.ridderstrom at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 May 2006, Neil Herber wrote:
> >
> > > At 2006-05-31  09:27 AM -0500, Tegan Dowling is rumored to have said:
> > >> (:if exists {$Name}-Talk:)There is also a [[{$Name}-Talk |
> > >> discussion]] page used during the development of this {$Titlespaced}
> > >> page.(:ifend:)
> >
> > Now I'd like to partly contradict myself and say that I'd like to see
> more
> > conventions used within PmWiki (and/or pmwiki.org). These conventions
> > would be there to help things look (and be!) more consistent, making the
> > site easier to use for casual users.
> >
> > One convention already in use at pmwiki.org is placing something like
> >
> >         %audience% authors (basic)
> >
> > at the top of each page to indicate the intended audience. The direct
> > consequence of this text is that it places a note at the top right side
> > indicating the indented reader. This is of course useful for someone
> > taking a quick look at the page.
> >
> > An indirect consequence of the convention of placing the above markup on
> > each such documentation page, also allows us to list all those pages, eg
> >         http://pmwiki.org/wiki/Test/ListBasicAudiencePages
>
> I like this. Below Christian mentions a second step of putting in a
> description in each page. I would go one step further and query
> whether we should put a (:description:) in every page, and in the page
> listing he offers have a template that lists the page with its
> description. That way, a more concise summary would be available in
> the page list. For descriptions that have a place in the body of the
> document, the author should only have to slip in a {$Description} to
> avoid redundancy.


I'd like some help understanding the use of (:description ...:) - how does
this relate to RSS-generation?  In the rest of the world, is there a
standard name and format for the summary clip that accompanies a link to an
RSS article?  is that called "description"?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/pmwiki-users/attachments/20060601/27603d15/attachment.html 


More information about the pmwiki-users mailing list