[pmwiki-users] RFC: Ratings Redux

[Patrick R. Michaud]

On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 12:33:01PM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> But in thinking about it more, I still think the [[!Unsupported]]
> approach may be superior.  Instead of trying to substitute an
> include at the point of a markup flag, we could have the include
> be handled automatically by the Category.GroupHeader:
> 
>     (:if target Category.Unsupported:)
>     (:include Cookbook.Unsupported:)
>     (:if:)


Ooooops, I meant that the above markup could go in the 
*Cookbook*'s GroupHeader, not Category.GroupHeader.

> The "target" condition would ask "is there a link from this page
> to Category.Unsupported", and if true then we'd include the contents
> of the Cookbook.Unsupported page.  This has the advantage of
> always putting the "unsupported" notice (as well as any others we
> may dream up) at the top of each recipe page, regardless of where
> the [[!Unsupported]] category markup appears in the recipe text.
> 
> Pm