[pmwiki-users] Highlight differences in the history
Patrick R. Michaud
pmichaud at pobox.com
Wed Aug 27 10:21:21 CDT 2008
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 08:55:14AM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I just had an unknown user correct a spelling error on a wiki page. Since
> I didn't know this user I wanted to check what he'd done in case it was
> spam. When I used the history link, I couldn't really see any changes.
> Then I showed the changes to the markup, in case some spam link was
> hidden with the changes. Unfortunately I still couldn't see what he'd
> actually changed (I've copied the output from the history to the end of
> this post in case you're curious).
> Because of this, I'd like to suggest that we eventually add some kind of
> highlighting of the actual changes. Should I add this as a PITS entry?
It already exists as http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/PITS/00571 . There's also
a proposed recipe for it at http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/InlineDiff,
which I haven't had a good opportunity to examine yet.
> (Highlighting text where markup is rendered might be difficult, but it
> should be less of a problem when you show changes to the markup).
Yes, highlighting of rendered markup is extremely difficult.
Overall I'm still looking for people to highlight other wiki engines
that perform word-level diffs so that I can get some idea of how they
More information about the pmwiki-users