[pmwiki-users] RFC: Localization InterMap
nzskiwi at gmail.com
Sun Sep 5 03:22:41 CDT 2010
To me http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L10n is a bit geeky for a wiki.
On 5 September 2010 19:10, Patrik Schrey <patrik.schrey at skynet.be> wrote:
> Hi All,
> From a maintenance point of view, I would go for the "Localization:"
> But reading the other suggestions, I like the proposal from Dave to prefix
> PmWiki groups with Pm, and the the proposal from PM to use "L10n".
> In the end the standard abbreviation for "Localization" (or "Localisation")
> is L10n,
> and is better than "Local" that could be interpreted in other ways.
> So combined this would be "PmL10n:".
> If this proposal wins, I would like to move the group itself also to
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Petko Yotov" <5ko at 5ko.fr>
> To: <pmwiki-users at pmichaud.com>
> Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2010 5:19 PM
> Subject: [pmwiki-users] RFC: Localization InterMap
> Hello. I'd like to read some comments about adding to a future PmWiki
>> a "Localization:" prefix to the default list of intermap links, pointing
>> the Localization/ group on PmWiki.org.
>> The Localization/ group contains information and help for translators. An
>> intermap prefix will make it easier to link pages in it from both the
>> documentation and the language translations.
>> There are different propositions for a prefix - the one I currently like
>> most is "Localization:", even if there is a risk that an existing wiki
>> have a legitimate use of such a prefix, much like the "Cookbook:" prefix,
>> pointing to a different location. (The "default" intermap links are not
>> overridden by [[Site.InterMap]] entries, it is slightly more complex to
>> If you have some comments, please reply here in the mailing list, or on
>> page in the PITS : http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/PITS/01180 .
> pmwiki-users mailing list
> pmwiki-users at pmichaud.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the pmwiki-users