On 3/29/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Neil Herber</b> <<a href="mailto:nospam@eton.ca">nospam@eton.ca</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
At 2006-03-28 10:41 AM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud is rumored to have said:<br>>I've been thinking of extending the auth condition to be able to<br>>work on pages other than the current one.<br>><br>> (:if !auth read
Subscriber.Issue4:)<br><br>This order make the most sense to me. It almost reads like English<br>"If you are not authorized to read Issue 4", and it adds "options" to<br>the end of the (:if !auth read:) directive.
</blockquote><div><br></div>I agree this makes the most sense for the reasons Neil describes - even if it is not the order I originally suggested!<br></div><br>I think it would be generally useful for adaptive 'table of contents' type situations - even though this is not quite how I intend to use it.
<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Allister