Thanks to all for the explanations :)<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/4/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Patrick R. Michaud</b> <<a href="mailto:pmichaud@pobox.com">pmichaud@pobox.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 09:20:52PM -0400, Neil Herber wrote:<br>> At 2006-05-04 08:54 PM -0400, Pico is rumored to have said:<br>> >The version naming scheme of PmWiki works a little different than what<br>> >you have in mind.
<br>><br>> Back in February, the thread called "Core Version Numbers" thrashed<br>> this topic to death. I am not sure that a consensus was ever reached,<br>> but one suggestion was version numbering like so:
<br>><br>> 3.2.0-beta14<br>> 3.2.0-beta15<br>> 3.2.0<br>> 3.2.1<br>> 3.2.2<br>> 3.2.3-pre1 <- trial release<br>> 3.2.3<br><br>I think the "consensus" (of one person -- i.e., me) ended up
<br>that we would use this numbering scheme starting with the *next*<br>set of betas. (I didn't want to switch numbering in the middle of<br>the 2.1 beta series.)<br><br>Of course, I have no plans at the moment for another beta series
<br>anytime soon. :-)<br><br>Pm<br></blockquote></div><br>