Dear Knut,<br><br>I suggest that we mention on the ZAP-related cookbook pages the URL with this new website where we will organize the maintenance/documentation and support of ZAP, very much like Dan used to do it.<br><br>
As far as the evolution of this recipe is concerned, I think that the idea is very much what you described, i.e. maintaining and perhaps developing functionalities while ensuring optimal interoperability with pmwiki.<br><br>
Cheers,<br><br>Benoit<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/8/12, Knut Alboldt <<a href="mailto:pmwiki@alboldt.de">pmwiki@alboldt.de</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi Benoir !<br><br>Ok, so I see I'm a little bit late ... :-) (my excuse: was offline<br>during holidays)<br><br>Well, as I wrote I'll will join the maintainance as far as I can (php<br>coding and docs).<br><br>How will the connection between the
<a href="http://Pmwiki.org">Pmwiki.org</a> cookbook-recipe for<br>ZAPForms and the new website be done ?<br>I've found installation files on the new website, this has to be kept in<br>synch with the cookbok-recipe, right ?
<br><br>I think keeping the up to date docs in the new wiki is a good idea, but<br>we then should also remove old stuff from the cookbook and point to the<br>doc-website (if this is ok for Pm)<br><br>As I said, I want to stay with Pmwiki (that's a must for me !:-), so any
<br>develepment should be done in accordance with the pmwiki-philosiphy (I<br>read a lot of the discussions about zapwiki in the maillist).<br><br>My intention of using ZAPForm in pmwiki is to add Form-Support for some<br>
pmwiki-groups / pages, not to replace core pmwiki-functions (I wrote<br>some modules in the past but had to find out by time, that they were<br>incorporated into pmwiki before I even could introduce my ideas here in<br>the list - and the core function are all better than mine !). As I write
<br>some days before I want to implement some<br><br>If ZAPForms are maintained, I think it's vital to change the recipe<br>according to changes in pmwiki regarding Form-Processing, i.e. if pmwiki<br>supports (new) form processing features in the future, the corresponding
<br>ZAPForm-functions should be migrated accordingly using the new<br>pmwiki-features.<br><br><br>so again: I would like to join !<br><br>cheers<br><br>Knut<br><br>PS: I did not follow the lists entry about the development of the PmForm
<br>module. How is the status ?<br><br>Benoit Dutilleul schrieb:<br>> Hello Knut,<br>><br>> Ben Stallings and myself were also eager to maintain the documentation.<br>> Ben is also interested and capable of maintaining the software.
<br>> I've set up a documentation site : <a href="http://zapdoc.web-farm.org">zapdoc.web-farm.org</a><br>> <<a href="http://zapdoc.web-farm.org">http://zapdoc.web-farm.org</a>> and I have renamed all the pages of the
<br>> support group + checked most links.<br>><br>> Maybe we could do the documentation/support/maintenance and perhaps<br>> further developments together? Dan has been supportive and happy about<br>> our initiative and, as always, I am pretty sure that he will be very
<br>> helpful. Ideally, our team would be capable of implementing new features<br>> of zapwiki for zap.<br>><br>> I look forward to reading your opinion on this. Kind regards,<br>><br>> Benoit<br>><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>