Using <a href="http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/TextCaptcha">captcha </a>or <a href="http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/TextCaptcha">textcaptcha </a>may be helpful here<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 29 May 2010 02:48, DaveG <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pmwiki@solidgone.com">pmwiki@solidgone.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im"><br>
<br>
On 5/28/2010 6:35 AM, Eemeli Aro wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On 27 May 2010 17:16, Wordit Ltd<<a href="mailto:wordituk@googlemail.com" target="_blank">wordituk@googlemail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
- The data does not have to be stored *before* verification because<br>
the data will be sent back when the user clicks the email link, and<br>
the key tells us if it's correct.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
The way I see it, storing the new user data on first submission is a<br>
relatively easy task, no matter what background storage system is<br>
used.<br>
</blockquote></div>
We'd need some way to manage the likely spam signups. Perhaps placing the 'pending verification' data in a separate page would suffice.<br>
<br>
~ ~ Dave</blockquote></div>