[Pmwiki-users] Re: PITS?
chr@home.se
chr
Mon Oct 25 15:00:44 CDT 2004
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> > So there is no difference between doing a PITS for PmWiki 1 or PmWiki 2?
>
> Right, I didn't want to have to look multiple places for issue tracking
> requests, and didn't want people to have to worry about putting issues
> into the correct site. They all go to the same place, regardless of
> version.
> - The description text is just wiki text, so it's okay to include links
> to other pages and sites to further demonstrate or explain the issue.
Ok. AFAICT, we should use markup as per PmWiki 2 in PITS?
> - The status of each issue is typically given as one of:
> "open" -- new issues and issues still under consideration
> "confirmed" -- the issue has been confirmed to exist but still needs a fix
> "awaiting feedback" -- more information is needed before the issue can
> be addressed
> "ToDo" -- Pm has it on his "to do" list of things to be addressed
> "suspended" -- the issue has been indefinitely postponed due to
> technical difficulty or lack of interest
> "closed" -- the issue has been resolved
>
> But it's also worth pointing out that if an issue is especially important
> to you and you want to get beyond simple appeals to my reason, it is
> possible to use economic and market incentives to adjust my perceptions
> of issues' priorities :-) :-).
> (See http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/PmWiki/SendPmMoney).
Or you implement it yourself and put it up as a cookbook page...
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderstr?m, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
More information about the pmwiki-users
mailing list