[Pmwiki-users] Re: PITS?

chr@home.se chr
Mon Oct 25 15:00:44 CDT 2004


On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:

> > So there is no difference between doing a PITS for PmWiki 1 or PmWiki 2?
> 
> Right, I didn't want to have to look multiple places for issue tracking
> requests, and didn't want people to have to worry about putting issues
> into the correct site.  They all go to the same place, regardless of
> version.

> - The description text is just wiki text, so it's okay to include links
>   to other pages and sites to further demonstrate or explain the issue.

Ok. AFAICT, we should use markup as per PmWiki 2 in PITS?

> - The status of each issue is typically given as one of:
>     "open" -- new issues and issues still under consideration
>     "confirmed" -- the issue has been confirmed to exist but still needs a fix
>     "awaiting feedback" -- more information is needed before the issue can
>         be addressed
>     "ToDo" -- Pm has it on his "to do" list of things to be addressed
>     "suspended" -- the issue has been indefinitely postponed due to
>         technical difficulty or lack of interest
>     "closed" -- the issue has been resolved
> 
> But it's also worth pointing out that if an issue is especially important 
> to you and you want to get beyond simple appeals to my reason, it is 
> possible to use economic and market incentives to adjust my perceptions 
> of issues' priorities :-) :-).  
> (See http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/PmWiki/SendPmMoney).  

Or you implement it yourself and put it up as a cookbook page...

/Christian

-- 
Christian Ridderstr?m, +46-8-768 39 44               http://www.md.kth.se/~chr




More information about the pmwiki-users mailing list