[pmwiki-users] Core Version Numbers

David Spitzley dspitzle at wash.k12.mi.us
Thu Feb 9 07:47:24 CST 2006


I have to admit, my normal instinct would be to go from primary release 2.X to betas 2.X.Y, and then make the following primary release 2.X+1


David

>>> "Patrick R. Michaud" <pmichaud at pobox.com> 02/08/06 10:31 PM >>>
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:39:07PM +0000, Susan wrote:
> As I understand it, the current version is 2.1beta24 (or higher), but several
> people are calling it 2.1.24.
> 
> When 2.1 is released, and the inevitable bug fixes happen, there will be a
> 2.1.24 release. (Okay, being really pessimistic, but there are people using
> lower beta releases.)
> 
> This is going to cause confusion.
> 
> I recommend that version 2.1 be skipped and go right to 2.2 .

It's an excellent point, but we took the same numbering approach with
2.0.betaXYZ <-> 2.0.x and (as far as I know) we didn't run into
any real confusion.  I'll  have to think about it a bit more
(opinions from others welcome).

Pm

_______________________________________________
pmwiki-users mailing list
pmwiki-users at pmichaud.com 
http://host.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users





More information about the pmwiki-users mailing list