[pmwiki-users] Core Version Numbers

Patrick R. Michaud pmichaud at pobox.com
Thu Feb 9 11:33:23 CST 2006


On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:28:07AM -0500, Neil Herber wrote:
> At 2006-02-08  09:31 PM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud is rumored to have said:
> >It's an excellent point, but we took the same numbering approach with
> >2.0.betaXYZ <-> 2.0.x and (as far as I know) we didn't run into
> >any real confusion.  I'll  have to think about it a bit more
> >(opinions from others welcome).
> 
> I have always found the 2.1.beta5 nomenclature unsettling, because 
> the released version number looks "smaller" - 2.1.0.
> 
> Perhaps if you used 2.1.0beta5 it would be clearer. That is, this is 
> the 5th beta of the intended final release 2.1.0.

That's a good idea -- since we're almost done with this beta series,
I'll keep it in mind for the next round of betas, whenever they occur.  
(I'm hoping that after 2.1.0 is released we'll stay with stable,
non-'beta' releases through the remainder of 2006.)

Pm




More information about the pmwiki-users mailing list