[pmwiki-users] Is version 2.1.beta8 available?

Erik Domingo edomingo1 at gmail.com
Fri May 5 10:19:52 CDT 2006


Thanks to all for the explanations :)

On 5/4/06, Patrick R. Michaud <pmichaud at pobox.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 09:20:52PM -0400, Neil Herber wrote:
> > At 2006-05-04  08:54 PM -0400, Pico is rumored to have said:
> > >The version naming scheme of PmWiki works a little different than what
> > >you have in mind.
> >
> > Back in February, the thread called "Core Version Numbers" thrashed
> > this topic to death. I am not sure that a consensus was ever reached,
> > but one suggestion was version numbering like so:
> >
> > 3.2.0-beta14
> > 3.2.0-beta15
> > 3.2.0
> > 3.2.1
> > 3.2.2
> > 3.2.3-pre1  <- trial release
> > 3.2.3
>
> I think the "consensus" (of one person -- i.e., me) ended up
> that we would use this numbering scheme starting with the *next*
> set of betas. (I didn't want to switch numbering in the middle of
> the 2.1 beta series.)
>
> Of course, I have no plans at the moment for another beta series
> anytime soon.  :-)
>
> Pm
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/pmwiki-users/attachments/20060505/fb255c3a/attachment.html 


More information about the pmwiki-users mailing list