[pmwiki-users] leading space rule? what rule?
christian.ridderstrom at gmail.com
christian.ridderstrom at gmail.com
Thu May 25 17:29:55 CDT 2006
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 11:33:54PM +0200, christian.ridderstrom at gmail.com wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 May 2006, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 11:40:44AM +0200, christian.ridderstrom at gmail.com
>>>> FWIW, I also think it's a mixed blessing to let lines starting with space
>>>> result in preformatted text. I think the reason for this choice is mostly
>>>> historic and then it's just stuck around...
>>>
>>> Historic tradition does play a part here, but also using leading
>>> whitespace for preformatted text does tend to do the right thing for
>>> many applications. If nothing else, a number of other wikis (including
>>> MediaWiki) use this particular convention, so it's worth keeping it.
>>
>> I just wonder if the other wikis have it for historic tradition ;-)
>
> Well, in PmWiki's case, historic tradition really was only a part
> of the basis for the decision. I could've eliminated the
> whitespace=>preformatted rule in 2.0, but I decided that leading
> whitespace really ought to mean *something*, and the only logical
> candidates were preformatted text and indented blocks.
> (And in 2.1 leading whitespace is able to serve both purposes
> reasonably well!)
Indeed. In fact, I think the leading whitespace is excellent, and the fact
that you can write something like
* bla bla
* bla bla
and have it perfectly consistent is very nice! Actually.. .maybe it's
even easier to explain to new users to do the above for a second level
bullet.
/C
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
More information about the pmwiki-users
mailing list