[pmwiki-users] Bug in (:title:) markup?

[Sandy]

Charles Little wrote:
> That could cause problems to existing sites, and doesn't correct anything, merely covers it up.  This doesn't seem like a bug as much as a design flaw.. Perhaps something needs to be added to the tag to allow the person doing the markup to specify that this particular instance is an override.
> 
> Thoughts? 
> 

First, Pm never changes anything that affects the behaviour of existing 
sites without consulting this group; he does not change simply for 
change's sake. Even if it's unanimous that the new way is better, he 
always puts in a flag so you can still have the old behaviour. Just one 
of the many little things that makes PmWiki such a nice program for real 
world users.

Second, for nested pages, my vote would be the "outer" or main page 
wins. If A (:includes B:) and B (:includes C:), A would win.

Third, for non-nested pages, first makes more sense to me. I put 
(:title:) at the top of every page, with what my English teacher called 
the topic paragraph. However, I can't think of a case other than 
(:include:) where having more than one (:title:) is intended.

Sandy