[pmwiki-users] quoted text markup
Peter Bowers
pbowers at pobox.com
Thu Sep 22 05:02:49 CDT 2016
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:15 AM, H. Fox <haganfox at users.sourceforge.net>
wrote:
> Example Company says {"Always properly quote
> examples.|http://example.com/Main/Quoting"}
>
> would produce
>
> Example Company says <q
> cite="http://example.com/Main/Quoting">Always properly quote
> examples.</q>
>
You've may well have the right order since the cite attribute is optional
and the quote itself primary, but the syntax is so reminiscent of a link ([[
http://example.com/Main/Quoting|Quoting Link]]) that I would prefer a
consistency in the order, putting the link first and the text second.
Otherwise, knowing myself, I will confuse myself because they are so
similar but with the order reversed... So here's what I would like to see
(probably in descending order of preference):
===(snip)===
1. Example Company says {"http://example.com/Main/Quoting|Always properly
quote examples."} (this feels very pmwiki-ish to me)
-or-
2. Example Company says {"Always properly quote examples."}{[
http://example.com/Main/Quoting]} (whitespace between the 2 elements would
be OK)
-or- (to move it away from the similarity to the link)
3. Example Company says {"Always properly quote examples."}[[
http://example.com/Main/Quoting]] (no whitespace would be allowed between
closing "}" and opening "[[" to differentiate between a quote followed by a
link)
-or-
4. Example Company says {"Always properly quote examples."[[
http://example.com/Main/Quoting]]} (no pipe symbol makes this feel like a
different type of markup)
===(snip)===
I just know when 2 markups are really similar but with small differences
they tend to get mixed up - at least in my mind.
-Peter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pmichaud.com/pipermail/pmwiki-users/attachments/20160922/44ef36d0/attachment.html>
More information about the pmwiki-users
mailing list