[pmwiki-users] Re: Re: Modified (:markup:)

[chr at home.se]

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Joachim Durchholz wrote:

> Alternatively, we could roll our own parsing machinery. The ruleset 
> machinery would remain largely unchanged, just the nestable rules would 
> need to have the replacement substitution to be deferred until after the 
> parser had a chance to establish the nesting structure. ("Parser" is one 
> of those scare words, but parsing for parenthese-style constructs isn't 
> really difficult.)
...
> Personally, I'd go for it despite the workload.
> But that's just my personal preference, others might find other things 
> more relevant.

Although I'd *really* like a proper parser, I don't think it's worth it -
certainly not now anyway. 

/Christian

-- 
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44               http://www.md.kth.se/~chr