[pmwiki-users] Recipe stability
Jiri Hladůvka / OBUTEX
admin at obutex.com
Wed May 2 03:29:43 CDT 2007
Beside the "Status:" there is a -Talk page, too.
At pmwiki.org is a page http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/PmWiki/PmWikiUsers
How about <Recipe>-Talk #RecipeUsers section with users recommendation.
I think it could be useful even it's on the users goodwill.
Regards,
Jiri
Patrick R. Michaud napsal(a):
> On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:19:42PM +0200, kjettil wrote:
>
>> My assessment of ZAP is now clear - thanks to the contributions over the
>> last 36 hours! But normally, it's a time consuming process to find out
>> which ones are in the rough.
>>
>
> I agree that it is very difficult to split the cookbook into
> "stable" versus "beta" groups, and it would also be difficult
> to move them from one group to another.
>
> This is also why we have the "Status:" line for each recipe.
>
> This does bring up another thought... as opposed to having
> "ratings" or "voting" on recipes [1], what if we called them
> "endorsements"?
>
> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.wiki.pmwiki.user/41611
>
> Pm
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pmwiki-users mailing list
> pmwiki-users at pmichaud.com
> http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
>
> __________ Informace od NOD32 2232 (20070430) __________
>
> Tato zprava byla proverena antivirovym systemem NOD32.
> http://www.nod32.cz
>
>
>
>
--
OBUTEX s.r.o
Ing.Jiří Hladůvka
Zlatovská 22
911 01 Trenčín
tel.: +421 (0)32 6587000
mailto:admin at obutex.com
http://www.obutex.com
More information about the pmwiki-users
mailing list